Hardcore:
@(7|_|@|_|_y, @|||) ||07 70 |33(0|V|3 |30663|) |)0|/||| ||| 53|V|@||7|(5, |3|_|7 ||[ 0||3 |5 70 @|)6|_|3 @5 70 7|{3 |o|)|o3|) 5|o3|_|_|||6 0|[ 0|/|||3|), |7 |/|0|_||_|) |33 @ |||(3 70|_|(|{ 70 |_|53 7|)|_|3 |_337 5|o3@|, @|||) ||07 @ |V|0|)3 |||73|)357|||6 /@|)|@7|0|| 7|{3|)30|[. Y0|_| |{@/3||'7 5@||) 7|{3 |/|0|)|) |)|6|{7, ||0|) |{@5 @||y0||3 3|_53. |/|3'|)3 |[@|) 70 0|353553|) |/||7|{ |o0|/|||3|) 70 |)3@|_|-/_3 |{0|/| |/||)||6 |/|3 @|_|_ @|)3.
Lite:
@c7u@11y, @nd n07 70 b3c0m3 b0663d d0wn !n 53m@n7!c5, bu7 !f 0n3 !5 70 @r6u3 @5 70 7h3 pr0p3r 5p311!n6 0f 0wn3d, !7 w0u1d b3 @ n!c3 70uch 70 u53 7ru3 1337 5p3@k, @nd n07 @ m0r3 !n73r357!n6 v@r!@7!0n 7h3r30f. Y0u h@v3n'7 5@!d 7h3 w0rd r!6h7, n0r h@5 @ny0n3 3153. W3'r3 f@r 70 0b53553d w!7h p0wn3d 70 r3@1!23 h0w wr0n6 w3 @11 @r3.
Mixed:
@C7u4lly, 4nd n07 70 B3C0m3 B0gg3d d0wn in 53m4n7iC5, Bu7 if 0n3 i5 70 4rgu3 45 70 7h3 pr0p3r 5p3lling 0f 0wn3d, i7 w0uld B3 4 niC3 70uCh 70 u53 7ru3 l337 5p34k, 4nd n07 4 m0r3 in73r357ing v4ri47i0n 7h3r30f. y0u h4v3n'7 54id 7h3 w0rd righ7, n0r h45 4ny0n3 3l53. W3'r3 f4r 70 0B53553d wi7h p0wn3d 70 r34liz3 h0w wr0ng w3 4ll 4r3.
And in English:
Actually, and not to become bogged down in semantics, but if one is to argue as to the proper spelling of owned, it would be a nice touch to use true leet speak, and not a more interesting variation thereof. You haven't said the word right, nor has anyone else. We're far to obsessed with p0wn3d to realize how wrong we all are.
@(7|_|@|_|_y, @|||) ||07 70 |33(0|V|3 |30663|) |)0|/||| ||| 53|V|@||7|(5, |3|_|7 ||[ 0||3 |5 70 @|)6|_|3 @5 70 7|{3 |o|)|o3|) 5|o3|_|_|||6 0|[ 0|/|||3|), |7 |/|0|_||_|) |33 @ |||(3 70|_|(|{ 70 |_|53 7|)|_|3 |_337 5|o3@|, @|||) ||07 @ |V|0|)3 |||73|)357|||6 /@|)|@7|0|| 7|{3|)30|[. Y0|_| |{@/3||'7 5@||) 7|{3 |/|0|)|) |)|6|{7, ||0|) |{@5 @||y0||3 3|_53. |/|3'|)3 |[@|) 70 0|353553|) |/||7|{ |o0|/|||3|) 70 |)3@|_|-/_3 |{0|/| |/||)||6 |/|3 @|_|_ @|)3.
Lite:
@c7u@11y, @nd n07 70 b3c0m3 b0663d d0wn !n 53m@n7!c5, bu7 !f 0n3 !5 70 @r6u3 @5 70 7h3 pr0p3r 5p311!n6 0f 0wn3d, !7 w0u1d b3 @ n!c3 70uch 70 u53 7ru3 1337 5p3@k, @nd n07 @ m0r3 !n73r357!n6 v@r!@7!0n 7h3r30f. Y0u h@v3n'7 5@!d 7h3 w0rd r!6h7, n0r h@5 @ny0n3 3153. W3'r3 f@r 70 0b53553d w!7h p0wn3d 70 r3@1!23 h0w wr0n6 w3 @11 @r3.
Mixed:
@C7u4lly, 4nd n07 70 B3C0m3 B0gg3d d0wn in 53m4n7iC5, Bu7 if 0n3 i5 70 4rgu3 45 70 7h3 pr0p3r 5p3lling 0f 0wn3d, i7 w0uld B3 4 niC3 70uCh 70 u53 7ru3 l337 5p34k, 4nd n07 4 m0r3 in73r357ing v4ri47i0n 7h3r30f. y0u h4v3n'7 54id 7h3 w0rd righ7, n0r h45 4ny0n3 3l53. W3'r3 f4r 70 0B53553d wi7h p0wn3d 70 r34liz3 h0w wr0ng w3 4ll 4r3.
And in English:
Actually, and not to become bogged down in semantics, but if one is to argue as to the proper spelling of owned, it would be a nice touch to use true leet speak, and not a more interesting variation thereof. You haven't said the word right, nor has anyone else. We're far to obsessed with p0wn3d to realize how wrong we all are.